三个大学生到山中小屋度假，却从此失去了联系，警方根据他们遗留在溪边的摄影机，转拷成一卷关键录影带，试图从影像寻找线索进而找寻三人的下落。画面显示大学生走到荒山野岭后，发现了一件8岁女孩沾着血迹的洋装，而后竟然出现失踪女童的影像，还拍到了被烧焦的头发，还有更多令人不寒而慄的影像，单纯的失踪人口桉件瞬间发展成为连环谋杀桉…警方马不停蹄的试图从影像中拼凑出线索，希望还有机会能救出他们…

根据真实的故事改编，《浴火鸟》是一部冷战惊悚片，背景设定于1970年代的苏联。故事讲述，谢尔盖（Sergey，一名陷入困境的应征者，他的最好的朋友路易莎（Luisa），一位迷人有野心的基地指挥官秘书，以及一个胆大的年轻战斗机飞行员罗曼，三者之间如何形成危险的三角恋爱关系。在好奇心的驱使下，他们开启了禁忌之恋，在暧昧与欺骗之间，爱情与友谊的界限开始模糊。随着罗曼的职业生涯受到威胁，谢尔盖被迫面对自己的过去，而路易莎（Luisa）也努力使家人团聚。在围城之内，他们冒着失去自由和生命的危险，面对克格勃不断升级的调查，他们之间的命运会走向何方？

某人在开车经过街区时被突然从天而降的碎玻璃砸中，当场毙命。警察及时赶到，将此案定为意外。而实际上，意外乃是犯罪团伙联手制造的假象。团伙的首领大脑（古天乐 饰），跟女人（叶璇 饰）、胖子（林雪 饰）以及嗑药老头（冯淬帆 饰），经常联手搞意外杀人。他们采取的手段多为利用电击、雷劈、车祸、悬挂物坠落等方式。在作案中，大脑负责全盘统领，女人协助做诱饵，胖子和嗑药老头做障眼法。在前面的案件中，由于嗑药老头导致的失误，险些令行动失败，所以大脑大发雷霆，生怕稍有闪失即遭覆灭。后来，在妻子（莫小奇 饰）的温柔乡中，大脑紧张的神经才得以恢复平静。然而，后一单的雨夜杀人计划依旧遇到了前所未有的难题，一个神秘人物陈芳洲（任贤齐 饰）的出现，改变了这个集团的命运……

The last time Britain was a major force in world cinema was in the 1960s; a documentary of a few years back on the subject was entitled 'Hollywood UK'. This was the era of the Kitchen Sink, social realism, angry young men; above all, the theatrical. And yet, ironically, the best British films of the decade were made by two Americans, Richard Lester and Joseph Losey, who largely stayed clear of the period's more typical subject matter, which, like all attempts at greater realism, now seems curiously archaic. 　　'King and Country', though, seems to be the Losey film that tries to belong to its era. Like 'Look Back in Anger' and 'A Taste of Honey', it is based on a play, and often seems cumbersomely theatrical. Like 'Loneliness of the long distance runner', its hero is an exploited, reluctantly transgressive working class lad played by Tom Courtenay. Like (the admittedly brilliant) 'Charge of the Light Brigade', it is a horrified, near-farcical (though humourless) look at the horrors of war, most particularly its gaping class injustices. 　　Private Hamp is a young volunteer soldier at Pachendaele, having served three years at the front, who is court-martialled for desertion. Increasingly terrorised by the inhuman pointlessness of trench warfare, the speedy, grisly, violent deaths of his comrades and the medieval, rat-infested conditions of his trench, he claims to have emerged dazed from one gruesome attack and decided to walk home, to England. He is defended by the archetypal British officer, Captain Hargreaves, who professes disdain for the man's cowardice, but must do his duty. He attempts to spin a defence on the grounds of madness, but the upper-crust officers have heard it all before. 　　This is a very nice, duly horrifying, liberal-handwringing, middle-class play. It panders to all the cliches of the Great War - the disgraceful working-class massacre, while the officers sup whiskey (Haig!) - figured in some charmingly obvious symbolism: Hargreaves throwing a dying cigarette in the mud; Hamp hysterically playing blind man's buff. 　　The sets are picturesquely grim, medieval, a modern inferno, as these men lie trapped in a never-ending, subterranean labyrinth, lit by hellish fires, with rats for company and the constant sound of shells and gunfire reminding them of the outside world. 　　The play, in a very middle-class way, is not really about the working class at all - Hamp is more of a symbol, an essence, lying in the dark, desolately playing his harmonica, a note of humanity in a score of inhumanity. He doesn't develop as a character. The play is really about Hargreaves, his realisation of the shabby inadequacy of notions like duty. He develops. This realisation sends him to drink (tastier than dying!). Like his prole subordinates, he falls in the mud, just as Hamp is said to have done; he even says to his superior 'We are all murderers'. 　　This is all very effective, if not much of a development of RC Sherriff's creaky 'Journey's End', filmed by James Whale in 1930. Its earnestness and verbosity may seem a little stilted in the age of 'Paths of Glory' and 'Dr. Strangelove'; we may feel that 'Blackadder goes forth' is a truer representation of the Great War. But what I have described is not the film Losey has made. He is too sophisticated and canny an intellectual for that. 　　The film opens with a lingering pan over one of those monumental War memorials you see all over Britain (and presumably Europe), as if to say Losey is going to question the received ideas of this statue, the human cost. But what he's really questioning is this play, and its woeful inadequacy to represent the manifold complexities of the War. 　　This is Brechtian filmmaking at its most subtle. We are constantly made aware of the artifice of the film, the theatrical - the stilted dialogue is spoken with deliberate stiffness; theatrical rituals are emphasised (the initial interrogation; the court scene, where actors literally tread the boards, enunciating the predictable speeches; the mirror-play put on by the hysterical soldiers and the rats; the religious ceremony; the horrible farce of the execution). Proscenium arches are made prominent, audiences observe events. 　　This is a play that would seek to contain, humanise, explain the Great War. This is a hopeless task, as Losey's provisional apparatus explains, 'real' photographs of harrowing detritus fading from the screen as if even these are not enough to convey the War, never mind a well-made, bourgeois play. Losey's vision may be apocalyptic - it questions the possibility of representation at all - the various tags of poetry quoted make no impact on hard men men who rattled them off when young; the Shakespearean duality of 'noble' drama commented on by 'low' comedy, effects no transcendence, no greater insight. 　　Losey's camerawork and composition repeatedly breaks our involvement with the drama, any wish we might have for manly sentimentality; in one remarkable scene an officer takes an Aubrey Beardsley book from the cameraman! This idea of the theatrical evidently mirrors the rigid class 'roles' played by the main characters (Hamp's father and grandfather were cobblers too; presumably Hargreaves' were always Sandhurst cadets). Losey also takes a sideswipe at the kitchen sink project, by using its tools - history has borne him out.

当人民的苦难不断加深之时，上帝将他的儿子耶稣（Enrique Irazoqui 饰）送到人间。受到感召，少女玛丽亚（Margherita Caruso 饰）以处子之身生下耶稣，并与未婚夫约瑟（Marcello Morante 饰）一同将其养大。耶稣如此钟爱世人，他通过各种神迹引导人们诚心向善，他的信徒和追随者越来越多。然而世界已然腐朽，贪婪残暴占据统治地位。那些忘掉廉耻的统治者决定除掉这个来自天堂的圣子…… 　　本片大量起用非职业演员，圣母玛丽亚更是由导演帕索里尼的母亲扮演。影片荣获1965年意大利国家影评人协会最佳摄影、最佳化妆和最佳导演奖；1964年威尼斯电影节OCIC（国际天主教电影事务所）奖和评委会特别奖；1968年芬兰国家电影奖最佳外语片导演奖。

斯科特·米勒（尼克·莱德 Nic Rhind 饰）大学时代曾像很多年轻人一样放荡不羁，他也因此受到处罚。在此期间，故乡华盛顿夏保福镇的女友杰西（Robyn Ledoux 饰）被父母强迫，与米勒分手。两年后，物是人非，米勒和杰西再次相遇，只能感叹有缘无份。此时米勒已经有了新的女友莉迪娅（Marina Pasqua 饰）。这是一个轻浮放荡的女子，她在鲨鱼俱乐部狂欢，最后惨死在洗手间内。偏巧目睹这一场面的米勒被当作杀人凶手，受到通缉。 　　此前当地一所拥有上百年历史的教堂失火，一名消防员在整理现场时无意中打开埋在地下的封印，只是恐怖的妖虫重返人间，而它也直接导致莉迪娅的死亡。得知真相后的米勒，最终能否消灭妖虫？

罗伯特博士（文森特·普莱斯 Vincent Price 饰）一直致力于在中美洲研究细菌，长此以往，罗伯特竟然在误打误撞之中获得了超强的免疫能力。一场非常可怕的瘟疫席卷了全球，地球上所有的生物都未能够幸免于难，除了罗伯特博士外，此时此刻，他成为了地球上的最后一个人类。 　　当然，罗伯特博士并不“孤独”，因为那些感染了瘟疫而死去的人们，他们的尸体会在午夜化身成为可怕的丧尸，爬出坟墓，聚集在罗伯特博士的居所周围，能够让他们暂停行动的，只有阳光。一次偶然中，罗伯特博士震惊的得知，他并非最后的幸存者，在世界的某一处，还有着一些和他一样的人类也在灾难中苦苦挣扎。

IAS officer Chanchala Reddy is imprisoned in a haunted house, while she is interrogated by law enforcers investigating a politician they suspect of corruption.

年轻的越南女孩Linh在单亲妈妈离开德国回越南的时候不得不承担起照顾自己照顾妹妹的责任。在此期间期间必须不能让人知道他们是独自生活的，特别是不能让警察和社区服务人员知道。但是同时，他们的一位让人讨厌且顽固的邻居Pauline知道了他们的秘密，并威胁姐妹俩要把秘密公布出去……这部电影就讲述了这几个孩子之间不同寻常的友谊的力量。

1919年，俄国内战。为躲避战火，斯拜罗斯（Vassilis Kolovos 饰）带着妻子戴娜（Thalia Argirioua 饰）和一双儿女，随着难民潮辗转来到希腊。十几年过去，俄国难民不断聚集，最终形成一个名为“新敖德萨”的小村庄。斯拜罗斯的养女艾莉妮（Alexa ndra Aidini 饰）如今已长成落落大方的漂亮姑娘，并和心爱的小伙同时也是她的非血缘兄长埃里克西斯（Nikos Poursanidis 饰）生下一对双胞胎。为了逃避养父的控制与霸占，艾莉妮与爱人开始漫无止境的逃亡。时间进入1936年，一家人暂时得以安定。为追寻音乐梦想，埃里克西斯告别妻儿远赴美国。在此之后，战争统治着这个世界，也摧毁了艾莉妮苦心经营的家庭。在混乱的大时代的背景下，他们随波逐流，生离死别…… 　　本片是“希腊三部曲”第一部，并荣获2004年欧洲电影节国际影评人费比西奖。