英国军情六处特工詹姆斯•邦德（丹尼尔•克雷格饰）这一次的任务是在赌场上赢取俄罗斯间谍手中的巨额财富，让其背后的恐怖组织势力无法达成阴谋并且击垮恐怖组织。这次，邦德有了一个漂亮的得力女助手琳德（伊娃•格林饰）。邦德经过了赌场上的种种训练，最终来到了皇家赌场。随着赌注越来越大，这场赌局也愈来愈显示出背后交错的阴谋。邦德甚至险些死于非命。 　　在共同的合作中，邦德和琳德不知不觉拥有了信任和默契，这种感情，将会何去何从呢？

《想入飞飞》是由台湾知名导演陈子谦执导，新加坡天后蔡淳佳主演的电影。讲述一名非常崇拜已故歌手凤飞飞的停车场女稽查员，为圆歌星梦不懈努力的故事。平凡女主角追梦故事致敬已故“帽子歌后”凤飞飞，带给一代人难忘的回忆。2015年9月17日在新加坡正式上映。《想入飞飞》是一部南洋范儿十足的电影。就语言上来说，该片虽主要是中文对白，却也有不少新马式的幽默。人物之间夹杂着福建话、马来语、英文的交流不仅贡献不少笑点，还让人迅速进入到新加坡本土电影的情境中。

查理（李·马文 Lee Marvin 饰）和李（克鲁·古拉格 Clu Gulager 饰）是拿钱办事的职业杀手，某次，在了结掉了他们的目标强尼（约翰·卡索维茨 John Cassavetes 饰）后，他们对这桩简单的让人简直不敢相信的买卖产生了怀疑。在好奇心的趋势下，查理和李开始调查强尼的底细，得知他曾是一位小有名气的赛车手，却因为赛场上的一起事故而被迫结束了职业生涯。 　　随着调查的不断深入，一个名为希拉（安吉·迪金森 Angie Dickinson 饰）的女人渐渐浮出了水面，希拉是黑帮老大布朗宁（罗纳德·里根 Ronald Reagan 饰）的情人，同时和被杀的强尼也有着千丝万缕的关联。渐渐地，查理和李发现他们陷入了一个深深的漩涡之中无法自拔。

一天，孤儿院寻找到了塞莱斯蒂娜（瓦蕾丽·卡尔桑迪 Valérie Karsenti 饰），希望她能够考虑收养小保罗卡拉代克（让·斯坎德尔 Jean Scandel 饰）。塞莱斯蒂娜心中矛盾，因为她认识保罗的亲生母亲，知晓了一些关于他的背景，于是起初拒绝了这个请求。然而，当她亲眼目睹保罗在孤儿院的悲惨处境时，内心的同情和责任感促使她最终做出了决定，冒险接纳了这个孩子。 　　塞莱斯蒂娜在隐瞒了保罗的身份后，将他带到了自己工作的庄园里。她的丈夫博雷尔（埃里克·埃尔莫斯尼诺 Eric Elmosnino 饰）是一名森林警察，对于保护森林中的野生动物义愤填膺，尤其对偷猎者托托什深恶痛绝。托托什是个机智灵巧的人，常常成功地逃脱博雷尔的追捕，让博雷尔感到十分沮丧。然而，在塞莱斯蒂娜的安排下，保罗结识了托托什，并与他建立起了一段特殊的友谊。他开始在托托什身边学习关于森林和狩猎的知识，童年生活因此变得丰富多彩。

The last time Britain was a major force in world cinema was in the 1960s; a documentary of a few years back on the subject was entitled 'Hollywood UK'. This was the era of the Kitchen Sink, social realism, angry young men; above all, the theatrical. And yet, ironically, the best British films of the decade were made by two Americans, Richard Lester and Joseph Losey, who largely stayed clear of the period's more typical subject matter, which, like all attempts at greater realism, now seems curiously archaic. 　　'King and Country', though, seems to be the Losey film that tries to belong to its era. Like 'Look Back in Anger' and 'A Taste of Honey', it is based on a play, and often seems cumbersomely theatrical. Like 'Loneliness of the long distance runner', its hero is an exploited, reluctantly transgressive working class lad played by Tom Courtenay. Like (the admittedly brilliant) 'Charge of the Light Brigade', it is a horrified, near-farcical (though humourless) look at the horrors of war, most particularly its gaping class injustices. 　　Private Hamp is a young volunteer soldier at Pachendaele, having served three years at the front, who is court-martialled for desertion. Increasingly terrorised by the inhuman pointlessness of trench warfare, the speedy, grisly, violent deaths of his comrades and the medieval, rat-infested conditions of his trench, he claims to have emerged dazed from one gruesome attack and decided to walk home, to England. He is defended by the archetypal British officer, Captain Hargreaves, who professes disdain for the man's cowardice, but must do his duty. He attempts to spin a defence on the grounds of madness, but the upper-crust officers have heard it all before. 　　This is a very nice, duly horrifying, liberal-handwringing, middle-class play. It panders to all the cliches of the Great War - the disgraceful working-class massacre, while the officers sup whiskey (Haig!) - figured in some charmingly obvious symbolism: Hargreaves throwing a dying cigarette in the mud; Hamp hysterically playing blind man's buff. 　　The sets are picturesquely grim, medieval, a modern inferno, as these men lie trapped in a never-ending, subterranean labyrinth, lit by hellish fires, with rats for company and the constant sound of shells and gunfire reminding them of the outside world. 　　The play, in a very middle-class way, is not really about the working class at all - Hamp is more of a symbol, an essence, lying in the dark, desolately playing his harmonica, a note of humanity in a score of inhumanity. He doesn't develop as a character. The play is really about Hargreaves, his realisation of the shabby inadequacy of notions like duty. He develops. This realisation sends him to drink (tastier than dying!). Like his prole subordinates, he falls in the mud, just as Hamp is said to have done; he even says to his superior 'We are all murderers'. 　　This is all very effective, if not much of a development of RC Sherriff's creaky 'Journey's End', filmed by James Whale in 1930. Its earnestness and verbosity may seem a little stilted in the age of 'Paths of Glory' and 'Dr. Strangelove'; we may feel that 'Blackadder goes forth' is a truer representation of the Great War. But what I have described is not the film Losey has made. He is too sophisticated and canny an intellectual for that. 　　The film opens with a lingering pan over one of those monumental War memorials you see all over Britain (and presumably Europe), as if to say Losey is going to question the received ideas of this statue, the human cost. But what he's really questioning is this play, and its woeful inadequacy to represent the manifold complexities of the War. 　　This is Brechtian filmmaking at its most subtle. We are constantly made aware of the artifice of the film, the theatrical - the stilted dialogue is spoken with deliberate stiffness; theatrical rituals are emphasised (the initial interrogation; the court scene, where actors literally tread the boards, enunciating the predictable speeches; the mirror-play put on by the hysterical soldiers and the rats; the religious ceremony; the horrible farce of the execution). Proscenium arches are made prominent, audiences observe events. 　　This is a play that would seek to contain, humanise, explain the Great War. This is a hopeless task, as Losey's provisional apparatus explains, 'real' photographs of harrowing detritus fading from the screen as if even these are not enough to convey the War, never mind a well-made, bourgeois play. Losey's vision may be apocalyptic - it questions the possibility of representation at all - the various tags of poetry quoted make no impact on hard men men who rattled them off when young; the Shakespearean duality of 'noble' drama commented on by 'low' comedy, effects no transcendence, no greater insight. 　　Losey's camerawork and composition repeatedly breaks our involvement with the drama, any wish we might have for manly sentimentality; in one remarkable scene an officer takes an Aubrey Beardsley book from the cameraman! This idea of the theatrical evidently mirrors the rigid class 'roles' played by the main characters (Hamp's father and grandfather were cobblers too; presumably Hargreaves' were always Sandhurst cadets). Losey also takes a sideswipe at the kitchen sink project, by using its tools - history has borne him out.

特丽莎（罗宾•莱特•潘 饰）离婚后，儿子是她的珍宝。她是一名专栏作家，为了给儿子好的生活，她工作勤劳。一天她在海边跑步的时候，捡到了一个玻璃瓶，里面竟有一封信。特丽莎深切的感受到了写信人心痛的感觉，阴差阳错之间这封信被刊登在了报纸上。读者反应热烈，为了乘胜追击，报社派出特丽莎寻找这封信的主人。 　　写信的人名叫盖瑞（凯文•科斯特纳 饰），自从妻子凯瑟琳离世之后，他每天都活在悲伤的阴影中，用信表达自己对妻子的爱意。特丽莎还是见到了这名伤心的男子，也没有告诉盖瑞她看过他写的那些瓶中信。 　　两人相处的过程中，特丽莎知道自己已经爱上她痴情的盖瑞，盖瑞也因为特丽莎的出现，生活多了许多生气。面对已经逝世的爱妻，与就在面前的特丽莎，盖瑞会如何选择……

1929年的越南是法国殖民地，一个15岁的法国少女（珍·玛奇 饰）在西贡女子寄宿学校读书。每逢假期她便回家，母亲办了一所很小的学校，收入甚少。她有两个兄弟，大哥比尔吸毒成瘾且横行霸道，弟弟保罗生性懦弱，常受大哥的欺负。一天少女一如往常一样告别母亲乘上渡船回学校，在船上遇到一个坐黑色大轿车的中国阔少爷（梁家辉 饰），他是华侨富翁的独生子。中国男人喜欢这名白人少女便去搭讪，两人便搭上了。 少女在寄宿学校里知道有的女生在外卖淫，她也想找个有钱人试试，因此很主动地与男人交谈。上岸后两人逛了西贡，还一起上馆子吃中国饭菜，男人用汽车送她回学校。第二天刚放学，黑色汽车就等在校门口了。 两人很快就坠入爱河。男人把少女带到他的公馆，这是中国富人们常用来金屋藏娇的地方。他俩在这里幽会、洗澡、玩耍。有时晚上也不回学校，校方只好通知她的母亲，然而……

故事开始于1941年的日本，战争爆发，东江康治（佐藤健 饰）作为一个平凡的热血青年，和大部分同龄人一起被迫成为了“铁血勤皇队”中的一员，走上硝烟四起的战场。在康治的内心里隐藏着一个秘密，曾经，为了赚取康治读初中的学费，康治的哥哥盛勇（要润 饰）前往美国打工，虽然一家人聚少离多，但彼此之间的亲情依然十分紧密。如今，日美开战，盛勇竟然成为了美国士兵中的一员。 　　怀揣着这个秘密，康治和好友胜一起来到了冲绳，在这里作战抵挡美军的登录，可是实际上，日方早就抛弃了这座小岛，这也就意味着康治和战友们注定会成为炮灰。眼看着战友们一个又一个的倒在了美军的子弹之下，康治开始对美军产生了发自内心深处的憎恨。

当人民的苦难不断加深之时，上帝将他的儿子耶稣（Enrique Irazoqui 饰）送到人间。受到感召，少女玛丽亚（Margherita Caruso 饰）以处子之身生下耶稣，并与未婚夫约瑟（Marcello Morante 饰）一同将其养大。耶稣如此钟爱世人，他通过各种神迹引导人们诚心向善，他的信徒和追随者越来越多。然而世界已然腐朽，贪婪残暴占据统治地位。那些忘掉廉耻的统治者决定除掉这个来自天堂的圣子…… 　　本片大量起用非职业演员，圣母玛丽亚更是由导演帕索里尼的母亲扮演。影片荣获1965年意大利国家影评人协会最佳摄影、最佳化妆和最佳导演奖；1964年威尼斯电影节OCIC（国际天主教电影事务所）奖和评委会特别奖；1968年芬兰国家电影奖最佳外语片导演奖。

本片讲述罗伯特·布鲁斯鲜为人知的真实故事。他昔日是战败的贵族，后来不情愿地当上国王，然后在曲折离奇的一年成为法外英雄。为了拯救家人、人民和国家，让中世纪的苏格兰脱离英格兰的暴虐佔领，罗伯特被迫投入战役。他夺得苏格兰国王之位，并召集一批乌合之众，抵抗世界上最强大的军队，而率领这支愤怒的军队的，是凶残的英格兰国王爱德华一世和他喜怒无常的儿子威尔斯亲王。